HarvestPlus logo
HarvestPlus: Breeding Crops for Better Nutrition

Home

About HarvestPlus

Micronutrient Malnutrition

Research & Implementation

Publications & Links

News Room

Contact Us

Members
Login

Impact Pathway

Target Crops

Programs

Bio-
fortification
FAQ

Biofortification Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is Biofortification?

Biofortification is the process of breeding food crops that are rich in bioavailable micronutrients, such as Vitamin A, Zinc, and Iron. These crops “biofortify” themselves by loading higher levels of minerals and vitamins in their seeds and roots, which are then harvested and eaten. Through biofortification, scientists can provide farmers with crop varieties that through the provision of essential micronutrients, could naturally reduce anemia, cognitive impairment, and other nutritionally related health problems in hundreds of millions of people.

2. Is Biofortification Sustainable?

Biofortifed crops developed through HarvestPlus are an international public good that will be made freely available to any national agricultural research programs who wants to grow them. While government attention to malnutrition may fade, and international funding for micronutrient interventions may be substantially reduced, nutritionally improved biofortified varieties can continue to be grown and consumed year after year raising the nutritional baseline of entire populations. Recurrent costs required for monitoring and maintaining these traits in crops will be far lower than the initial costs of developing biofortified crops.

3. Do Biofortified Foods Require a Change in Consumer Behavior?

Mineral micronutrients make up a tiny fraction of the physical mass of a seed, for example, only 5 to 10 parts per million in milled rice. Whether such small amounts will alter the appearance, taste, texture, or cooking quality of foods is being investigated. In the case of iron and zinc, increased levels of nutrients may not be noticeable to consumers, nor require special intervention or marketing campaigns. This would be analogous to the practice of adding fluoride to drinking water in some countries.

In contrast, higher levels of beta-carotene (converted in the body to Vitamin A) will often turn the color of grain, flours and roots/tubers from white or light yellow to dark yellow and orange. However, consumers often prefer milled rice, wheat flour, maize, and cassava that is white in color. Nutrition education programs will be needed to encourage consumers to switch to more nutritious varieties. If these nutrition education programs are successful, the yellow-orange color will distinguish the more nutritious varieties from the less nutritious.

4. Is Biofortification Cost Effective?

Unlike the continual financial outlays required for supplementation and fortification programs, a one-time investment in breeding-based solutions can yield micronutrient-rich plants for farmers to grow around the world for years to come. It is this multiplier aspect of biofortification across time and distance that makes it so cost-effective.

How much nutrition an US$80 million investment can buy, by intervention
Supplementation   Plant breeding/Biofortification
Provides vitamin A supplementation to 80 million women and children in South Asia for two years, 1 in 15 persons in the total population, at a cost of 25 cents for delivery of each pill, each effective for 6 months. Provides iron fortification to 33 percent of the population in South Asia for two years. Costs of fortification are estimated to be 10 cents per person per year. Develops 6 nutrient-dense staple crops for dissemination to all the world's people for consumption year after year. This includes dissemination and evaluation of nutritional impact in selected countries.

5. Does Biofortification Require Genetic Engineering?

No. In fact most of the work being done by HarvestPlus to biofortify staple food crops relies on traditional plant breeding techniques to increase the nutritional quality of staple foods. Seed and germplasm banks throughout the world are evaluated for varieties of staple food crops that have naturally occurring higher levels of micronutrients in their seeds. These varieties are then crossed with modern high yielding varieties in an attempt to breed new naturally biofortified varieties that perform well in the field, produce high yields, and that are also more nutritious. However, those essential nutrients that cannot be bred into key food staples through conventional plant breeding methods may require transgenic breeding approaches to provide enough nutrients to have a positive impact on human health.

6. Are You Planning on Disseminating Transgenics as part of HarvestPlus?

HarvestPlus is conducting preliminary research to determine the potential of transgenics for improving nutritional status. All crops developed by HarvestPlus are public goods and will be given over to countries upon request. It is the national agricultural research programs in developing countries that will make dissemination decisions. Furthermore, as policy, HarvestPlus will not distribute GMOs ever developed under its auspices to any country that does not have biosafety regulatory systems in place or does not wish to adopt transgenic varieties.

7. How Soon Will Biofortified Crops be Available?

In its first four years, HarvestPlus has proven that crops can be bred to contain higher levels of micronutrients but the work does not stop here. It takes many years to breed and test new varieties of crops that have all the required traits to satisfy both farmer and consumer needs. Biofortified crops must also be field tested in different growing environments to ensure that they maintain these traits and can deliver sufficient micronutrients to consumers to improve their nutritional status. More than 100 scientists, researchers, and marketing and behavioral change specialists around the world are working together to develop and test HarvestPlus crops. It is anticipated that by 2010, several varieties of micronutrient-rich staple crops should be ready for distribution in the developing world where micronutrient malnutrition is prevalent

8. How Will Biofortification Improve Agronomic Properties of Crops?

Adequate nutrition is as important to disease resistance and stress tolerance in plants as it is in humans. Micronutrient deficiency in plants greatly increases their susceptibility to diseases, especially fungal root diseases of the major food crops. Efficiency in the uptake of mineral micronutrients from the soil is associated with disease resistance in plants, which leads to decreased use of fungicides. Breeding for micronutrient efficiency can confer resistance to root diseases that had previously been unattainable.

Micronutrient-efficient varieties grow deeper roots in mineral-deficient soils and are better at tapping subsoil water and minerals. When topsoil dries, roots in the dry soil zone (which are the easiest to fertilize) are largely deactivated and the plant must rely on deeper roots for further nutrition. Roots of plant genotypes that are efficient in mobilizing surrounding external minerals not only are more disease resistant, but are better able to penetrate deficient subsoils and so make use of the moisture and minerals contained in subsoils. This reduces the need for fertilizers and irrigation. Plants with deeper root systems are also more drought resistant.

Micronutrient-dense seeds are associated with greater seedling vigor, which, in turn, is associated with higher plant yield A significant percentage of the soils in which staple foods are grown are “deficient” in these trace minerals, which has kept crop yields low. In general, these soils, in fact, contain high amounts of trace minerals, enough for hundreds or thousands of crops. However, because of chemical binding to other compounds, these trace minerals are “unavailable” to staple crop varieties presently used.

9. Can Biofortified Crops Reduce Soil Fertility?

A soil is said to be deficient in a given nutrient when the addition of fertilizer produces better growth—even though the amount of nutrient in the fertilizer added may be small compared with the total amount of the nutrient in the soil. This seeming paradox can occur when only a small part of the nutrient in the soil is available to plants, owing, for example, to the chemical properties of the soil. Alternatively, the view can be taken that there is a genetic deficiency in the plant rather than a deficiency in the soil. Rather than adapting the soil to the plant, breeding can adapt the plant to the soil.

The table below gives an analysis of both total and extractable micronutrients in one trace element-deficient sandy soil in comparison with the nutrients removed in the grain of an average crop grown on that soil. The picture presented for nitrogen is quite different from that for trace minerals. Few soils of the world can sustain high yields for long periods without additional supplies of nitrogen, either by rotation of the crop with nitrogen-fixing legumes or from mineral fertilizer additions. Thus, it is pointless to breed for greater tolerance to nitrogen-deficient soils. Trace minerals are present in much greater concentrations (compared with plant needs) even in a nutrient-impoverished soil such as that below. It is logical, then, to concentrate breeding efforts on these elements with low requirements or low availability, but large reserves in the soil.

Nutrient balances in a wheat-growing soil of South Australia
Element Amt removed in grain Total amount in deficient soil Equivalent crops Amount extracted from deficient soil Equivalent crops
  (mg per kg) (grams per hectare) (mg per kg) (grams per hectare) (number) (mg per kg) (grams per hectare) (number)
Nitrogen 20,000 30,000 1,200 2 X 106 67 12 20,000 0.67
Phosphorus 2,000 3,000 250 3.8 X 106 1,250 5 75,000 25
Copper 2 3 3 45,000 15,000 0.3 4,500 1,500
Zinc 20 30 5 75,000 2,500 0.3 4,500 150
Manganese 33 50 10 150,000 3,000 1 15,000 300
Molybdenum 0.1 0.15 1 15,000 100,000 0.05 750 5,000
Source: Graham 1978.

 

  Back to top ^

   © 2007 HarvestPlus all rights reserved. HarvestPlus is a Challenge Program of the CGIAR